I recently visited a factory in Como, Italy. They still run three Punchants. They use them exclusively for "antiquing"—converting modern vector art into files that mimic 1920s hand-run Schiffli. They output the .PUN files to a modern Barudan, then chemically burn away the backing. The result is indistinguishable from lace woven in 1955. The Barudan Punchant is a reminder that digitizing is not graphic design. It is choreography. It is physics.

Modern multi-head embroidery is stiff. We use heavy backing, sharp needles, and high tension to force the thread into a stable substrate.

Because the Punchant's processor was so slow (we're talking 8MHz), it couldn't store complex shape data. Instead, it stored commands . "Go left. Satin stitch, width 1.2mm. Density 4. Stop." The actual curve was drawn by the machine's real-time kinematics.

And yet, in 2026, a well-maintained Punchant system still trades hands for thousands of dollars. Why?

To the uninitiated, the Barudan Punchant (often stylized as Punchant or Punch-lant ) looks like a relic. It’s a standalone, dedicated digitizing workstation that peaked in the late 1980s and early 1990s. It has a monochrome CRT screen, a proprietary puck (tablet), and a user interface that makes DOS look like iOS.

The Punchant’s secret sauce wasn't the hardware; it was the .

Barudan didn't just make a digitizer; they made the Punchant. It was designed specifically for Barudan multi-head machines, but the format (Barudan .DAT or .PUN) became a lingua franca for high-end lace.