If you are an archivist, a digitization specialist, or a university library scanning fragile newspapers, DjVu is still superior to PDF for text-heavy scans. The open-source community has kept it alive (via tools like DjVuLibre ), and many digital humanities projects still rely on it.
If you scanned a high-resolution 300-page book in the late 90s, your PDF would be hundreds of megabytes. Too big to email. Too slow to download. Too clunky to scroll. lizardtech djvu
But for the average office worker? Probably not. The plugins are dead. Modern PDFs (PDF/A) have caught up on compression, and OCR (Optical Character Recognition) has made text searchable in ways DjVu’s outdated toolchains struggle with. LizardTech’s DjVu was a victim of its own timing. It was too technical for the masses and too niche for the giants. But it wasn't a failure. If you are an archivist, a digitization specialist,