Poetics Of Imagination 99%
By reconfiguring reality, narrative imagination can propose new ways of acting. Ricoeur calls this the “poetic moment” of practical reason: before we decide, we must imagine what a good life could be. The poetics of imagination thus underwrites moral innovation. 5. The Aesthetic-Pragmatic Horizon: Iser and Walton Wolfgang Iser extends poetics into reader-response theory. In The Act of Reading (1976), he argues that literary texts are structured with gaps (Leerstellen) that the reader’s imagination must fill. These indeterminacies are not defects but engines: each reader produces a different “virtual” object. The poetics of imagination becomes a performance —a game of perspective-taking and anticipation.
| Principle | Description | Example | |-----------|-------------|---------| | | Imagination operates via tropes (metaphor, metonymy, synecdoche) that transfer properties across domains. | “The sun kissed the sea” – personification. | | Configurational synthesis | Imagination integrates disparate elements into coherent wholes (images, plots, schemas). | The four seasons as a narrative of birth–death–rebirth. | | Negativity | Imagination works through absence: to imagine X is to hold X as non-present yet present-as-if. | Mental imagery of a deceased loved one. | | World-disclosure | Poetic imagination opens alternative modes of being-in-the-world, often by defamiliarizing the habitual. | Kafka’s Metamorphosis disclosing alienated labor. | poetics of imagination
Where Coleridge emphasizes imagination as synthesis , Bachelard emphasizes eruption . Yet both agree: imagination precedes and shapes reflective thought. 4. Hermeneutic Turn: Ricoeur’s Poetics of Metaphor and Narrative Paul Ricoeur synthesizes Romantic and phenomenological threads into a linguistic-hermeneutic framework. In The Rule of Metaphor (1975) and Time and Narrative (1983–85), he argues that imagination is the capacity to see as —to redescribe reality under novel categories. These indeterminacies are not defects but engines: each
To develop these claims, we move through three moments: the Romantic foundation (Coleridge), the phenomenological turn (Bachelard, Ricoeur), and the aesthetic-pragmatic extension (Iser, Walton). Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s distinction between fancy and imagination remains the inaugural gesture of modern poetics. In Biographia Literaria (1817), he defines the primary imagination as “the living Power and prime Agent of all human Perception” (Coleridge, 1983, p. 304). Imagination is not a faculty among others; it is the transcendental condition for synthesizing sensory manifold into coherent objects. and image-schema—that can be analyzed formally.
This paper advances two core theses: (1) Imagination is , not decorative: it generates the very textures of experience. (2) Its poetic operation follows discernible logics—metaphor, narrative emplotment, and image-schema—that can be analyzed formally.
