Then came the twin shocks: the (the “Lost Decade”) and the Washington Consensus of the 1990s . The future was privatized. The state, which had been the architect of tomorrow, became the obstacle. As Carlos Fuentes once lamented, Latin America became a region condemned to “repeat its mistakes because it has no memory of its successes.”
is not about arriving. It is about the return to the path. It is the recognition that the future is not a destination in the Global North. It is a direction—a spiral—that starts right here, in the mud of the barrio , in the code of the hacker , in the rhythm of the candombe . volver al futuro latino
But something is shifting. The phrase (Returning to the Latin American Future) is not about nostalgia. It is not a longing for the military dictatorships, the hyperinflation, or the lost decades. It is, instead, a conscious intellectual and cultural movement to reclaim the future from the ruins of neoliberalism and the broken promises of Silicon Valley. Then came the twin shocks: the (the “Lost
In the Andean and Mesoamerican worldviews, time is not a straight arrow (past→present→future) but a spiral. The future is a return to a previous state, but higher up the spiral. The Quechua concept of Pachakuti (the turning of time/space) suggests that the future is not a blank slate but a reordering of ancestral knowledge. When Bolivian indigenous movements speak of Vivir Bien (Buen Vivir) instead of living better , they are not retreating to the past. They are proposing an economy of sufficiency—a radical ecological future that looks like a recovered past. As Carlos Fuentes once lamented, Latin America became
We must leave behind the . The future cannot be built by digging up the earth for lithium to power Teslas. The future must be post-extractive : circular, bio-inspired, and small-scale.
Introduction: The Ghost of a Future That Never Came For most of the 20th century, Latin America was a laboratory of the future. From the futuristic utopias of Brasília (1960) to the cybernetic socialism of Salvador Allende’s Project Cybersyn (1971), the region dreamed in technicolor. Yet, by the turn of the millennium, that future seemed to have been cancelled. The narrative shifted: Latin America became a land of “eternal present,” a place of cyclical crises, informal economies, and magical realism—a genre that, as critics noted, stopped being magical when reality became too absurd to invent.
In the 1960s and 70s, Latin American futurism was radical. Architects like Lina Bo Bardi and Oscar Niemeyer built concrete poems of possibility. Writers like Jorge Luis Borges and Julio Cortázar bent time like a Mobius strip. The future was a left-wing project: land reform, industrialization, and sovereignty.